Get Your Personal
On-Air Report Here
What's Hot | Search |
Thursday, March 06, 2008
Posted by: Duane Patterson at 5:25 PM
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi decided on February 13th, 2008, that she and her trial lawyer lobby knew more about national security than the Bush administration, all of the United States intelligence agencies, over half of the state Attorneys General, Democrat and Republican, the United States Senate, Democrat and Republican, and an overwhelming majority of House members, Democrat and Republican, and let the patch to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act expire.  As of Midnight the following Sunday, any foreign to foreign communications that happen to go through American company switching can no longer be listened to without a court order, blinding our intelligence and military agencies from acting to prevent future terrorist attacks on U.S. soil. 

What has Speaker Pelosi done with her time since she single-handedly put the country at greater risk by intentionally weakening the national defense?   On February 14th, the House considered 8 suspension bills, and 2 motions to adjourn, about five hours work.  They then broke for ten days to celebrate President's Day. On the 25th, they took up 3 suspension bills.  On the 26th, they started to work on the public housing bill, but withdrew it before final consideration.  On the 27th, Pelosi actually passed something - the energy tax bill. On the 28th, 3 more suspension bills.  Total work week? 15 hours and 5 minutes.

This week, there were three more suspension bills on the 4th, six more suspension bills and the mental health bill on the 5th.  And then we saw today's antics.

The House scheduled amendments and debate to reauthorize Americorps for five more years.  After tediously working through a couple of amendments, former California Attorney General and current Congressman, Dan Lungren, took to the floor and tried to hijack the Americorps bill by instead demanding the House take up the Senate version of the FISA bill.  Even blue dog Democrats want to get this thing done before something bad happens and Nancy Pelosi politically ruins the party.  But no, leadership can't have this discussion now, not when there's lawsuits to be had against the telcos for cooperating with the U.S. government to catch terrorists. George Miller, acting as the chief stooge for Nancy Pelosi, sought and achieved a ruling from the chair that Lungren's amendment was not germane, and therefore out of order.  Lungren and the Republicans appealed the ruling, and forced a vote.  It was narrowly defeated. 

Next Amendment to the Americorps bill was another Republican-drafted amendment to recommit the bill unless all Americorps candidates would have to subject themselves to a background check.  On the surface, that doesn't seem like such a bad idea - we would typically not want to see criminals flooding the ranks of Americorps volunteers.  This amendment sent the House leadership into a frenzy, not wanting to see a vote on this amendment.  After a brief delay in the action, Pelosi and her gang ended up pulling the overall Americorps bill from consideration, and abruptly adjourned for the week.  Another ten hour work week, and foreign terrorists know that for at least one more week, we are bound to an arcane law that is 20 years behind our current technology, providing a loophole for them to plot and scheme.

It will have been 23 days of blinding intelligence to foreign terrorist communications before the House reconvenes next week.  And there is literally one person on which to lay the liability  - Nancy Pelosi.  But she is not the only person who should take the heat.  There are a lot of House Democrats who would vote for this bill in a second, because despite policy differences, they do recognize the importance of getting national security right.  But while many of them have quietly complained to Pelosi since the FISA patch expired, they have not twisted her arm enough.  House Democrats should demonstrate that they put the national security of the country ahead of their party's politics.  They should take the long walk to Speaker Pelosi's office and tell her this is not what they signed up for.  

Our intelligence service has a hard enough time trying to detect and prevent attacks without having to do it blindfolded, deafened and with one arm tied behind their back by one of Nancy Pelosi's trial lawyers.



View in ascending order View in descending order
mhu cao writes: Thursday, March, 06, 2008 5:44 PM
Pelosi and Reed Are Criminals
They have wasted billions of public dollars and trillions in national value by undertaking cheap shots, whiny protests, and pandering positions.

They have weakened our country's strength and image. They have put our military in harm's way.

They had a great opportunity to shine since 2006. Instead of getting down to the People's work, they oursue their personal agenda, and vendettas. They are criminals.
Beastie Boy writes: Thursday, March, 06, 2008 5:53 PM
Nonsense!
Our intel agencies can still get warrants, just as the law demands. Whatever happened to the concept of oversight?
mhu cao writes: Thursday, March, 06, 2008 6:12 PM
So, What Is A Warrant?
Let me try to simpligy this. What is a warrant, Beastie Boy? What procedure is required to obtain a warrant? What information is required? How is that information to be obtained? How is that information to be qualified? How is that information to be presented? May just any judge handle a warrant that includes classified information? How about security clearances? Are there separate procedures for matters related to foreign intelligence? Is there a separate court, or will just any federal district court do? Do you know why such procedures may be necessary? Do you have any idea of the threats against which surveillance of foreign nationals may be necessary?

Oh, I could go on, but it doesn't matter. It's one of those issues where, if you need to ask, you wouldn't understand.
charlie writes: Thursday, March, 06, 2008 7:44 PM
my, oh, my
who will rid us of this loathsome biotch!
Slobberdog writes: Thursday, March, 20, 2008 7:15 AM
IMPEACH PELOSI - Someone, please.
How can she continue to get away with this treasonous behavior. Why can't she be gotten rid of?

PS between now and the elections I hope Obama gets the nomination - looks like he is getting easier and easier to beat.
mhu cao writes: Thursday, March, 20, 2008 9:08 AM
Pelosi Is A Criminal
So is Harry Reed, and their Boy Obama.
Sign Up to Post Your Comments Sign Up to Post Your Comments
Please take a few seconds to sign up, then you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, create your own blog and more! If you are already registered, click here.
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
 

Duane "Generalissimo" Patterson is the producer of the nationally syndicated "Hugh Hewitt Show". In a sense Duane is "the man behind the curtain" -- and this is his blog.
Young America
Young America's Foundation
Panel Discussion: Remembering Reagan
Listen Now Listen Now
Click to download Podcast Podcast
Daily Commentary
Daily Commentary
The First Press Conference
Listen Now Listen Now
Click to download Podcast Podcast
Dennis Prager
Dennis Prager
Open Lines
Listen Now Listen Now
Click to download Podcast Podcast
 
Support Young Life
Archives
Blog Search: